Case study: Proxmox VE demo cluster (3× node, Ceph, HA)
1. Requirements and parameters
| Parameter |
Value |
| Number of hosts |
3 |
| Purpose |
demo, learning, development |
| Hypervisor |
Proxmox VE (free) |
| Budget |
low-cost (~$10,000–$15,000) |
| Storage |
Ceph (HCI) |
| HA |
yes |
| Location |
1 rack, standard office room |
2. Server configuration
Based on a combination of the Mini variant (2–3 hosts, single-socket) and the pure Ceph variant per SERVER-CONFIG.md. Each of the 3 nodes is identical.
2.1 Single node configuration
| Component |
Specification |
Rationale |
| CPU |
1× AMD EPYC 9224 (24C/48T, 200 W TDP) or Intel Xeon 5418Y (16C/32T) |
SERVER-CONFIG.md: "Pure Ceph variant: CPU 1× EPYC 9224–9334 (12–24C)". Ceph requires 1–2 cores per OSD; with 3 OSD + Proxmox + VM, 12+ cores is the minimum. |
| RAM |
128 GB DDR5-4800 (4× 32 GB RDIMM, 1DPC) |
SERVER-CONFIG.md: "RAM 128–256 GB" for Ceph variant. 128 GB is sufficient for demo; 4–8 GB per OSD + OS + lightweight VMs. |
| OS disk |
2× 240 GB SATA SSD, RAID 1 (HW controller in HBA mode or SW mdadm) |
"OS: 2× SATA SSD RAID 1" per Ceph variant. |
| Ceph OSD |
3× 960 GB SATA SSD (HBA/IT mode, no HW RAID) |
"Ceph OSD: 4–8× NVMe/SATA SSD (RAW, HBA mode)". For demo we reduce to 3 OSD/node. Total 9 OSD in cluster. |
| NIC |
2× dual-port 10 GbE SFP+ (total 4× 10 GbE) |
"Network: 2× 25 GbE public + 2× 25 GbE cluster". For low-cost we choose 10 GbE (SFP+), the concept remains the same. |
| BMC |
1× 1 GbE (iDRAC / iLO / IPMI) |
Standard management port, CONNECTIVITY.md. |
| Form factor |
1U rack server (Dell R660, HPE DL360 Gen11, or Supermicro) |
19" rack, suitable for 1U. |
2.2 CPU choice rationale
KB states for the Mini variant "1× EPYC 4124 (4C) or Xeon E-2400". However, 4 cores is insufficient for Ceph (OSD + Proxmox + VM). Therefore we choose EPYC 9224 (24C) / Xeon 5418Y (16C), which corresponds to the Ceph variant in SERVER-CONFIG.md. The price is higher, but the cluster is functional for real-world testing.
3. Storage variant — Ceph
3.1 Topology
3.2 Ceph configuration
| Parameter |
Value |
Note |
| Replication |
3 (size = 3, min_size = 2) |
Standard per STORAGE.md |
| Failure domain |
host |
CRUSH: replication across nodes |
| Raw capacity |
9 × 960 GB ≈ 8.6 TB |
|
| Usable capacity |
~2.9 TB (8.6 / 3) |
Sufficient for demo |
| OSD backend |
BlueStore |
Default in Ceph, recommended |
| MON quorum |
3 (1 per node) |
Minimum for HA |
| Cache |
RAM (BlueStore cache) |
1–2 GB per OSD |
| Network public |
2× 10 GbE LACP |
VM traffic + Ceph frontend |
| Network cluster |
2× 10 GbE LACP |
Ceph backend replication |
| MTU |
9000 (jumbo frames) |
Recommended per NETWORKING.md |
3.3 Storage layout on disk
3.4 Ceph pool design
| Pool |
PG count |
Replication |
Purpose |
| vms |
128 |
3× |
VM disks (RBD) |
| data |
64 |
3× |
Data volume |
| backups |
32 |
3× |
Backups (low priority) |
PG count is approximate for demo (9 OSD). Production formula: (OSD_total × 100) / replication_size.
4. Network
4.1 Topology
4.2 VLAN and traffic segmentation
| VLAN |
Purpose |
Ports |
MTU |
| VLAN 10 |
Management (Proxmox web UI, SSH) |
1× 1 GbE BMC |
1500 |
| VLAN 20 |
VM traffic + Ceph public |
2× 10 GbE (bond) |
9000 |
| VLAN 30 |
Ceph cluster (backend) |
2× 10 GbE (bond) |
9000 |
4.3 Switch
| Parameter |
Value |
| Model |
MikroTik CRS326-24S+2Q+RM or similar L2+ switch |
| Ports |
24× SFP+ 10 GbE |
| Management |
VLAN 10, IP 10.0.0.254/24 |
| Features |
VLAN, LACP (LAG), Jumbo frames (MTU 9000), SNMP |
4.4 Cabling
| Type |
Length |
Quantity |
Purpose |
| SFP+ DAC (passive) |
3 m |
12 |
10 GbE connection server ↔ switch |
| Cat6A UTP |
3 m |
3 |
Management (1 GbE BMC) |
| Cat6A UTP |
1 m |
1 |
Internet uplink (patch panel) |
DAC cables are cheaper than SFP+ optics + patch cords — suitable for single-rack.
5. Rack layout
5.1 Dimensions and positions
| U |
Device |
Power (W) |
| U1 |
Switch 10 GbE (1U) |
~60 W |
| U2 |
UPS (2U) |
— |
| U3 |
(empty, ventilation) |
— |
| U4 |
Server Node 1 (1U) |
~250 W |
| U5 |
Server Node 2 (1U) |
~250 W |
| U6 |
Server Node 3 (1U) |
~250 W |
| U7–U15 |
Empty (optional storage, patch panel) |
— |
| Parameter |
Value |
| Rack type |
15U wall-mount, 19", 600×600 mm |
| Total IT load |
~810 W |
| PUE estimate |
~1.5 (office room, no precision cooling) |
| Cooling |
Standard office AC (ASHRAE A2: 10–35 °C). Sufficient for <1 kW. |
Note: KB (DATACENTERS.md) states free air cooling for low density (<5 kW/rack). Standard ventilation and AC are sufficient in an office.
5.2 UPS
| Parameter |
Value |
| Type |
VI (line-interactive) — per DATACENTERS.md for smaller racks |
| Capacity |
2000 VA / 1200 W |
| Backup time |
~15–20 min at 810 W load |
| Output |
8× C13 (for servers + switch) |
| Battery |
VRLA (cheaper) or Li-ion LFP |
| Management |
USB / SNMP card (automatic Proxmox shutdown) |
Optionally can be upgraded to VFI (double-conversion) UPS for cleaner output, but VI is sufficient for demo.
5.3 PDU
1× basic 1U PDU (8× C13), 230 V / 10 A — for distribution to servers.
6. Hypervisor — Proxmox VE
6.1 Installation and configuration
| Component |
Version / Configuration |
| Hypervisor |
Proxmox VE 8.x (Debian 12 + KVM + LXC) |
| Storage backend |
Ceph Reef / Squid (18.x) integrated in Proxmox |
| Cluster |
3-node cluster, Corosync + PMXCFS |
| HA |
Proxmox HA — 1 node failure tolerance (remaining 2 take over VMs) |
| Fencing |
watchdog (softdog) + Proxmox HA manager |
6.2 License
| Item |
Price |
Note |
| Proxmox VE |
$0 |
Open source, full functionality without license |
| Proxmox community support |
$0 |
Forum, wiki |
| Proxmox enterprise support (optional) |
~€500/host/year |
Can be purchased later |
HYPERVISORS.md: Proxmox VE is "open source (free)", no license required.
6.3 HA setup
- HA group: all 3 nodes, no-quorum-policy = "stop" (for demo)
- Max VM restart: 2 attempts
- Migration: live migration via Ceph RBD (shared storage)
7. Budget estimate
Disclaimer: KB does not contain specific component prices. The following amounts are approximate market estimates (Q2 2026, USD).
7.1 Servers (3×)
| Item |
Qty |
Price/unit |
Total |
| 1U rack server (basic config, without CPU/RAM/disk) |
3 |
~$1,200 |
$3,600 |
| AMD EPYC 9224 (24C) / Intel Xeon 5418Y (16C) — per KB |
3 |
~$900 |
$2,700 |
| RAM 128 GB (4× 32 GB DDR5-4800 RDIMM) |
3 |
~$600 |
$1,800 |
| 240 GB SATA SSD (OS) |
6 |
~$50 |
$300 |
| 960 GB SATA SSD (Ceph OSD) |
9 |
~$150 |
$1,350 |
| Dual-port 10 GbE SFP+ NIC (e.g. Intel X710-DA2) |
6 |
~$120 |
$720 |
| Servers total |
|
|
~$10,470 |
7.2 Network
| Item |
Qty |
Price/unit |
Total |
| MikroTik CRS326-24S+2Q+RM (24× 10GbE SFP+) |
1 |
~$600 |
$600 |
| SFP+ DAC cable 3 m (passive) |
12 |
~$15 |
$180 |
| Network total |
|
|
~$780 |
7.3 Rack and power
| Item |
Qty |
Price/unit |
Total |
| 15U wall-mount rack 19" |
1 |
~$300 |
$300 |
| UPS 2000 VA (line-interactive, VRLA) |
1 |
~$450 |
$450 |
| 1U PDU basic (8× C13) |
1 |
~$60 |
$60 |
| Rack + power total |
|
|
~$810 |
7.4 Other
| Item |
Price |
| Cat6A patch cables, management |
~$50 |
| Mounting material, velcro |
~$30 |
| Shipping and installation |
~$200 |
| Other total |
~$280 |
7.5 Total calculation
| Category |
Amount |
| Servers (3× node) |
~$10,470 |
| Network (switch + cables) |
~$780 |
| Rack + power |
~$810 |
| Other |
~$280 |
| Total |
~$12,340 |
| Reserve (10–15%) |
~$1,200–1,800 |
| Total with reserve |
~$13,500–$14,100 |
Budget $10,000–$15,000 is achievable. Using cheaper CPUs (EPYC 4124P / Xeon E-2488), it can be built for ~$8,000–9,000, but with limited performance for Ceph.
Possible savings:
- CPU: 2× EPYC 4124P (4C) + 1× more powerful node → ~$800 savings (but asymmetric cluster)
- OSD: 2× instead of 3× SSD/node → ~$500 savings (less capacity)
- Switch: 12-port instead of 24-port → ~$300 savings
8. Topology diagram
9. Summary and key decisions
| Decision |
Variant |
Rationale |
| Hypervisor |
Proxmox VE |
HYPERVISORS.md: "For SME / low budget — open source, built-in Ceph, no license costs". Ideal for demo. |
| Storage |
Ceph (3× replication) |
STORAGE.md + SERVER-CONFIG.md: Ceph is the recommended SDS for Proxmox, 3 nodes minimum for quorum. |
| CPU |
Single-socket EPYC 9224 / Xeon 5418Y |
Compromise between price (Mini variant ~1 socket) and performance for Ceph (Ceph variant ~12+ cores). |
| Network |
10 GbE SFP+ (instead of 25 GbE) |
KB recommends 25 GbE, but for low-cost demo 10 GbE is sufficient. The concept (public/cluster network separation) remains the same. |
| Rack |
15U wall-mount |
Suitable for office, no raised floor, no precision cooling. |
| UPS |
2000 VA line-interactive |
DATACENTERS.md: VI type for smaller racks. Sufficient for demo. |
| License |
Proxmox VE (free) |
No license costs, support can be purchased later. |
Compromises compared to production deployment
- 25 GbE → 10 GbE: lower Ceph cluster network throughput (not an issue in demo environment)
- HDD → SSD: for Ceph OSD we choose SSD instead of HDD (higher price, better performance — demo focuses on functionality, not capacity)
- 2× 10 GbE public + 2× 10 GbE cluster → combined on LACP: can be merged when ports are scarce, but separation is better
- Cooling: office AC, not DC-grade precision cooling (PUE ~1.5–1.8)
What KB does not address (supplemented from practice)
KB does not contain specific component prices — the budget is an approximate market estimate. It also does not specify a concrete switch model with L2+ features (VLAN, LACP, Jumbo frames). Here we follow common practice for the SOHO/SME segment.
10. References from KB
- DATACENTERS.md — rack layout, power chain, UPS types, cooling classes (ASHRAE), cabling standards
- HYPERVISORS.md — Proxmox VE as open source variant, platform comparison, Mini variant (2–3 hosts), Ceph connectivity
- SERVER-CONFIG.md — Pure Ceph variant (3–6 hosts), HW specification, network design, BIOS settings
- STORAGE.md — Ceph architecture (MON/MGR/OSD, CRUSH map, BlueStore, replication), SDS overview
- CONNECTIVITY.md — Ethernet speeds (10/25 GbE), SFP+ form factor, NIC placement, management port
- NETWORKING.md — VLAN segmentation, MTU and jumbo frames, best practices
- SERVER-HW.md — CPU selection (EPYC vs Xeon), RAM population (1DPC/2DPC), NUMA, form factors
Last revision: 2026-06-04